Page 1 of 2
Graphics card
PostPosted:Sat May 24, 2008 11:37 pm
by Zabuza
anyone know a better/compatible graphics card for this computer stuff?
Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition (5.1, Build 2600)
Processor: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz, ~2.0GHz
and current graphics card : Intel(R) 82845G/GL Graphics Controller
if it helps its like a 2002 hp pavilion computer.
Re: Graphics card
PostPosted:Sun May 25, 2008 8:47 am
by Phoenix
Zabuza wrote:anyone know a better/compatible graphics card for this computer stuff?
Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition (5.1, Build 2600)
Processor: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz, ~2.0GHz
and current graphics card : Intel(R) 82845G/GL Graphics Controller
if it helps its like a 2002 hp pavilion computer.
We'll either need to know the motherboard details or the model number of the computer, without them we have no indication towards which graphics card will be compatiable.
Also from my own experience HP computers aren't that good when it comes to upgrading. Also "graphics" card you have listed is an onboard card and its whats known as "intergrated graphics".
Pho~
PostPosted:Sun May 25, 2008 11:09 am
by Melissa
to be honest your whole PC is old spec
a new graphics card wouldnt even get into 2nd gear and you utilize 10% in your PC, thats if you have an AGP slot
PostPosted:Sun May 25, 2008 11:41 am
by Zabuza
basically buy a new computer?
PostPosted:Sun May 25, 2008 1:18 pm
by Phoenix
Zabuza wrote:basically buy a new computer?
Pretty much

PostPosted:Sun May 25, 2008 5:35 pm
by Zabuza
well any suggestions i just want like a 300-450 dollar one. nothing fancy just better graphics than what i have right now
PostPosted:Sun May 25, 2008 6:26 pm
by Chantelle
your going to as said specify your motherboard
Or take the side off take a photo and post it
there is a possibility your motheboard may not have a slot for a graphics card.
I dunno what prices are like in US but id save up an extra $100 maybe $200
then you could grab a duo core , motherboard 2GB 500GB drive (mayb less) you could knock together a pretty reasonable system
say $150 processor
$100 board
$100 RAM
drive $80
guessing prices btw
then you get say 8800GT pretty good price now
Its not cutting edge but its a pretty good system and a million light years better than what you got which not only is pushing 7 years maybe 8 spec wise but it was also a budget system (celeron)
give me a link to your site and ill price up a system for you
PostPosted:Sun May 25, 2008 8:39 pm
by Darko
Dunno about you guys but i wouldn't be able to get a half decent computer for anything less then 1000 euro.
PostPosted:Sun May 25, 2008 8:54 pm
by Chantelle
difficult to compare since the the euro changes all to the pound
I could get a half decent PC for around £5-600 id say easily, not cutting edge but sound , without graphics card if it was home pc no need for gaming then £400
PostPosted:Sun May 25, 2008 9:07 pm
by Darko
Zabuza wrote:i just want like a 300-450 dollar one.
He said doller btw. Which is even weaker then the euro. Maybe you thought he meant pound?
PostPosted:Sun May 25, 2008 9:20 pm
by Chantelle
nope but I did say he could do wih getting at least $600
In US the parts are cheaper so the difference is negaited a lot
PostPosted:Sun May 25, 2008 10:56 pm
by Zabuza
PostPosted:Sun May 25, 2008 11:07 pm
by Chantelle
Is your monitor okay?
thing is that also has an integrated graphics card which is naff
you could minus the monitor and upgrade the graphics card
also for the extra $30 get home premium its soooo much better than vista basic..
If you know someone who can build you a PC youd get it even cheaper...
PostPosted:Sun May 25, 2008 11:08 pm
by Chantelle
edit the 530 you can have an ATI card built into price its a HD 2400 PRO
not cutting edge but its alot better than what you have..
8600 nvidia might be worth the extra $40 on top of teh $520 though
PostPosted:Mon May 26, 2008 12:23 am
by Zabuza
ill just stick to windows XP if , havent had problems with it
PostPosted:Mon May 26, 2008 7:50 pm
by FlapJack23
I built my computer for like $550, and it runs fine. I can play most new games maxed out.
If you really want a good computer for cheap, build it yourself. It's not very hard (all you really need to do it is a guide), and it's easy to do. You also have your own computer that you built, so you know what everything is in case you need to upgrade.
PostPosted:Mon May 26, 2008 10:34 pm
by Chantelle
what graphics card did you get ? and what was the cost in that budget? it may help determine his answer.
I agree building a pc is like a box of lego.. but dont blame you if your not sure.
PostPosted:Tue May 27, 2008 6:16 am
by Richard
bet you caannot play Crysis on Max
PostPosted:Tue May 27, 2008 9:47 am
by Phoenix
Richard wrote:bet you caannot play Crysis on Max
Crysis is ahead of the game in regards to the demand it puts on hardware. We have the game running at work on full settings and it's no where near as good graphics as everyone makes it out to be.
Pho~
PostPosted:Tue May 27, 2008 10:12 am
by Richard
you must have an absolute beast to get very high on everything high res fsaa x 4 + etc.. even then I bet you dont get good FPS.
wasnt suggesting it was teh best but it seems to causealot of hardware strain..
Its mainly down to the engine of what it does with the detail. the whole package I have yet to see a game come close to it.
PS3 or Xbox could forget trying to run it even close to what it could without castrating it
PostPosted:Tue May 27, 2008 11:08 am
by Phoenix
The PC i'm talking about runs it at around 22 - 23 fps on average (Highest settings). Which is certainly playable to any level. But even then thats running on an 8800gtx card and pushing it to its limits.
The point of my above post was just to point out the fact that Crysis is ahead of the game in regards to resource requirements. No average PC has a chance in hell at running it with anything above medium settings. The developers however are paying the price for their mistake. All you have to do is look at the amount of people that have returned the game because their computers just can't run it.
Just seems stupid from a developers point of view in my opinion ^_^
Pho~
PostPosted:Tue May 27, 2008 11:55 am
by Richard
I dont disagree at all it was badly made rather than making max use of the hardware
and to further prove the point, I dont think the 8800gtx woudl be able to run it on full settings
you will have probably high only and at high re you will need to drop off the FSAA.. in DX10 I know this as I played it with a 9800GTX
only the 9800 GX2 and ATI 3870 X2 would be able to muscle it, and considering their prices!!!
yet games like COD4 have good graphics (not as good by a little ditance) yet run flawlessly, although saying that I dont like it as much
I get teh feeling Crysis has been made shoddingly
PostPosted:Tue May 27, 2008 12:32 pm
by Kenshin
arent we kinda straying away from zab original post atm? lol
PostPosted:Tue May 27, 2008 12:54 pm
by Richard
yes and no, he could be looking to play crysis if he was looking for a new card.. which case he coudl do with forking out a bit more, difficult you see if he spends less now , he will be looking to upgrade in a lesser time... swings roundabouts eh.. thats technology for you.
maybe he should specfy what games he wants to play.. then a better evaluation of a budget could be determined
PostPosted:Tue May 27, 2008 1:44 pm
by Zabuza
i just play jka on computer...... everything else is on xbox 360,wii,gamecub,nintendo 64,gameboy, and super nintendo