ok so lets make a scenario.
bob and joe are on the server,and bob starts trolling joe,as bob is a realy good troller he makes joe realy realy mad that starts flaming him.
than normaly on the server,the admin silences joe for flaming,but we all know that it was bobs fault for him flaming,cuz he pushed his buttons.
so wouldnt it be fair to punish bob,before he angers joe so bad that goes out of hand,and starts flaming.
because like this,it seems like we punished the wrong person.
so i know that anoyence,is not against the rules but,its that anoyance that make people break the rules.It doesnt have to be flaming it could be even laming.
so my question here to make it easyer,is,why just not stop bob trolling joe?
bob and joe are on the server,and bob starts trolling joe,as bob is a realy good troller he makes joe realy realy mad that starts flaming him.
than normaly on the server,the admin silences joe for flaming,but we all know that it was bobs fault for him flaming,cuz he pushed his buttons.
so wouldnt it be fair to punish bob,before he angers joe so bad that goes out of hand,and starts flaming.
because like this,it seems like we punished the wrong person.
so i know that anoyence,is not against the rules but,its that anoyance that make people break the rules.It doesnt have to be flaming it could be even laming.
so my question here to make it easyer,is,why just not stop bob trolling joe?
[color=#FF8000]Jawfin[/color] wrote: Zab's fault (as per usual)