Went through your 101 thread. Some questions and suggestions.
4: -SHOW RESPECT AND BE HELPFUL TO EVERYONE!
Do not health run. This means healing yourself while in the midst
of a fight, or leaving a fight to heal. (This rule can be bent if only
among KR Members)
This rule is inconsistent. You restrict health running I PRESUME because it is not 'fair', but then make an exception for KR members. Your following rule states you cannot 'use any unfair advantages in a fight', is this not a contradiction?. Which is it to be? Either all of us can health run, or none of us.
A further complication, if you really want to get into things. By giving KR members the advantage of permissible health running and punishing non KR members you may discourage prospective members and visitors from participating in FFA etc. A punitive response is not positive.
You may retort and say 'yes but this is a non issue'. If that is your line, then please remove it from your rules.
Rules should be succinct and relevant rather than frivolous.
Do not talk negatively about another KR member on the forums
or on the server, especially when that player is not there to
defend themselves. If you have an issue with a player, confront
that player directly or contact a Council or Arbiter member about
it through PM.
You need to tighten up your language. What does 'talk negatively' mean? Am I not allowed to criticise somebody? If you mean I can only critise constructively then that is fine by me, and if this is what you mean make it explicit.
In either event the rest of the rule is superfluous. If you are not allowed to criticise (in a negative manner) a KR member on the forums or on the server in the first place, I do not see why it matters whether or not they are there. I find that extension having little relevance because the definition of talking negatively you imply is not bound to somebody being present. Either talking behind someone's back or stabbing them in the front, I see no reason why the two should not be treated the same.
A bit of me thinks that the ambiguous wording in "talk negatively" suggests even constructive criticism is risky. You say the best decision is to contact an admin, or your subject, directly. I can only hypothesise that this alternative is not meant for hurling insults privately but to argue constructively. Again, this implies constructive argument is akin to "talking negatively". In contrast, abuse is both privately and publicly unacceptable. Constructive criticism should not be. Remember that constructive criticism will ALWAYS have something negative about it.
Condensing it, any kind of criticism contains negativity, are you saying this is not permissible in public (forum/server)? Or by "talking negatively" you simply mean "abuse"? If so, I do not see why it is more acceptable to relay it through admins or directly at your subject.
The criticism here is your imprecise use of the word "talk negatively". I think you should tidy this up. Rules like this should never be vague and frankly this rule, which is an important one, is loose to me.
This is not an attack on your clan, you guys are tops. But when I played the thought experiment of "I wonder if I would join if I was invited?" and read your 101 thread my response would be a firm "No". Not because of your members or your server environment, but because I find your rules partly lacking. When I see poorly, albeit minor, constructed rules I can only assume the people who wrote them reflect their imprecision unintentionally. This assumption may prevent me from joining, and my assumption is not groundless as I hope this post demonstrates.
Thank you for reading.
4: -SHOW RESPECT AND BE HELPFUL TO EVERYONE!
Do not health run. This means healing yourself while in the midst
of a fight, or leaving a fight to heal. (This rule can be bent if only
among KR Members)
This rule is inconsistent. You restrict health running I PRESUME because it is not 'fair', but then make an exception for KR members. Your following rule states you cannot 'use any unfair advantages in a fight', is this not a contradiction?. Which is it to be? Either all of us can health run, or none of us.
A further complication, if you really want to get into things. By giving KR members the advantage of permissible health running and punishing non KR members you may discourage prospective members and visitors from participating in FFA etc. A punitive response is not positive.
You may retort and say 'yes but this is a non issue'. If that is your line, then please remove it from your rules.
Rules should be succinct and relevant rather than frivolous.
Do not talk negatively about another KR member on the forums
or on the server, especially when that player is not there to
defend themselves. If you have an issue with a player, confront
that player directly or contact a Council or Arbiter member about
it through PM.
You need to tighten up your language. What does 'talk negatively' mean? Am I not allowed to criticise somebody? If you mean I can only critise constructively then that is fine by me, and if this is what you mean make it explicit.
In either event the rest of the rule is superfluous. If you are not allowed to criticise (in a negative manner) a KR member on the forums or on the server in the first place, I do not see why it matters whether or not they are there. I find that extension having little relevance because the definition of talking negatively you imply is not bound to somebody being present. Either talking behind someone's back or stabbing them in the front, I see no reason why the two should not be treated the same.
A bit of me thinks that the ambiguous wording in "talk negatively" suggests even constructive criticism is risky. You say the best decision is to contact an admin, or your subject, directly. I can only hypothesise that this alternative is not meant for hurling insults privately but to argue constructively. Again, this implies constructive argument is akin to "talking negatively". In contrast, abuse is both privately and publicly unacceptable. Constructive criticism should not be. Remember that constructive criticism will ALWAYS have something negative about it.
Condensing it, any kind of criticism contains negativity, are you saying this is not permissible in public (forum/server)? Or by "talking negatively" you simply mean "abuse"? If so, I do not see why it is more acceptable to relay it through admins or directly at your subject.
The criticism here is your imprecise use of the word "talk negatively". I think you should tidy this up. Rules like this should never be vague and frankly this rule, which is an important one, is loose to me.
This is not an attack on your clan, you guys are tops. But when I played the thought experiment of "I wonder if I would join if I was invited?" and read your 101 thread my response would be a firm "No". Not because of your members or your server environment, but because I find your rules partly lacking. When I see poorly, albeit minor, constructed rules I can only assume the people who wrote them reflect their imprecision unintentionally. This assumption may prevent me from joining, and my assumption is not groundless as I hope this post demonstrates.
Thank you for reading.